Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 168 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 327 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 64.3 0% 45.8 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 57.3 51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 79 129 50 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 287 Write 256 Mixed 134 SusWrite 96.8 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 32.5 94% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 197 179% 275 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 111%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 327GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 86 85 86 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 75.5 Write 72.8 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 84.8 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	326x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	308x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $105