Yibin ZED Air CX7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 81% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemYibin ZED Air CX7  (all builds)
MotherboardYibin Yibin Wei Heng
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 81%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7Y75
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 157
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 212
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 591E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 2280 SATA SSD 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 86 36 94 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 224
Write 96.7
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 62.5
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 5.9
58% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 69.3
72% 117 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron TBHBYYVHKIGMH12345 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZED Air CX7 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Yibin ZED Air CX7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback