Acer Z5WAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Z5WAE  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Larne
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 22:30
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Memory 28.3
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 41
20% 31.4 Pts
4-Core 61.5
8-Core 62.8
8% 62.2 Pts
64-Core 56.1
4% 56.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Acer(1025 0865) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 2.6
1% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 122 84 66 59 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 250
Write 120
Mixed 202
SusWrite 104
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 14.5
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 111
85% 116 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z5WAE Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Z5WAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback