Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 692
62% 526 Pts
64-Core 2,082
129% 2,082 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 169
Parallax 198
166% 190 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 107%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 400GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 425 428 428 427 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,026
Write 394
Mixed 180
SusWrite 425
111% 506 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 24
90% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 193
146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
658GB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1917 1953 1928 1013 1314 1307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,706
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,851
SusWrite 1572
402% 1,780 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 50.4
156% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 314
234% 313 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 227%
Great: 604%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 65.4
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 47.3
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 136%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback