Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EQN_K513EQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EQN_K513EQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EQN
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 06:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 144
2-Core 233
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 359
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1A1C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 13.9
10% 19 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 14.2
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 816 719 318 309 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 724
Write 1,056
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 553
192% 848 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.5
239% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 749
537% 705 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 168%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 18.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EQN_K513EQ Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EQN_K513EQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback