HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime35.3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 16:30
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470S CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 330
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 72 59 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 463
Write 293
Mixed 329
SusWrite 72
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 24.4
94% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 164
151% 227 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback