Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101228
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '22 at 22:37
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 156 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 196 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1A30Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 188 63 28 12 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 231 Write 210 Mixed 154 SusWrite 111 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 8.1 66% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 9.2 17% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 81%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 393GB free Firmware: MS1OA610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 130 132 134 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 131 Write 127 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 128 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 1604 FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 13.6 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIQ57BQ Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	15x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	30x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	7x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	3x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	3x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	11x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	9x
FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 1604 FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16