Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 87.8
47% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 113
19% 134 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN10SM21SCY256MTNV 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0914A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 229 283 289 380 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 690
Mixed 765
SusWrite 304
159% 717 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 4.2
95% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 313
186% 201 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 190%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
757GB free
Firmware: JU002U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 106 104 106 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 76.3
Write 86.4
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 104
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback