Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131103
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 13:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 293
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90B5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 5.81
6% 6.56 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 5.61
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 FDE 2.5" 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM77D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43% Average
Read 248
Write 233
Mixed 228
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 10.6
50% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 14
31% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 52%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 256GB
238GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 117
Mixed 133
173% 142 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 11.4
1,368% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 11.8
1,645% 22 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 138%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 18JSF51272AZ-1G4K1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback