Acer Aspire X3990

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X3990  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3990
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 175
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 303
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
EVGA(3842 1529) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
536GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 108
Mixed 75
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 114%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
37GB free, PID null, Steren
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 25.9
Mixed 87.7
91% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 3.6
160% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 10242398 Kingston 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3990 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3990

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback