Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 186
77% 129 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 284
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7C09) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 3.8
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 160 152 168 170 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 146
Write 160
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 160
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
9GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.1 0.5 4 6.1 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 157
Write 9
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 4.8
34% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
108% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback