Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 00:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 331
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 912
97% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,150
71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 197
Parallax 195
165% 198 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
124% 155 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
201GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 206 82 82 81 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 488
Mixed 423
SusWrite 160
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 51.4
182% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 121%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 223 219 222 221 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,967
Write 1,283
Mixed 519
SusWrite 264
222% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 52.1
221% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 1,127
DQ Mixed 676
621% 947 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 210%
Great: 236%
256gb PCS 2.5" SSD 256GB
224GB free
Firmware: U0119A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 428 431 439 439 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 442
Mixed 407
SusWrite 428
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 27
131% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 38.6
93% 188 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 102
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 36.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 38.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback