Exper ACTIVE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemExper ACTIVE  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 13:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 133
54% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 169
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 14.5
12% 15.6 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 17
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-128 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 85 32 60 5 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 227
Write 216
Mixed 204
SusWrite 58.1
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 34.8
47% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
206GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 64
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 04CD F3-1600C11-4GNT 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACTIVE Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback