Today's hottest deals

HP p6-2060a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2060a  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC2
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111005
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 05:26
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 161
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 311
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 139 138 130 134 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 219
Write 199
Mixed 198
SusWrite 147
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 22.1
76% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6K1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2060a Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2060a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback