Performance Results


Gaming 157% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 145% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 79.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 286 91% 170 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 953 93% 762 Pts	64-Core 971 60% 971 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 8.6 5% 8.07 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 0.3 4% 5.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Gigabyte(1458 4088) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (240 fps cap detected)	173% Outstanding	Lighting 240 Reflection 240 Parallax 240 196% 240 fps	MRender 240 Gravity 240 Splatting 196 182% 226 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 655 637 608 590 560 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,266 Write 1,104 Mixed 1,070 SusWrite 628 228% 1,017 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 65.5 215% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1343 DQ Write 821 DQ Mixed 998 766% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 142GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1782 857 567 576 576 575 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,187 Write 2,003 Mixed 1,418 SusWrite 822 359% 1,608 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 63.8 213% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,518 DQ Write 898 DQ Mixed 1,102 849% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 665GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 106 98 106 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 182 Write 149 Mixed 77 SusWrite 104 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.4% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 20.7 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 20.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,094x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,154x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,083x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	744x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	698x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	539x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	669x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	438x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	411x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16