Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 348
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.9.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 85.6
52% 70.8 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 46.7
48% 60 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 143 141 142 139 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 446
Mixed 377
SusWrite 172
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 49.5
164% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
97GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 182 54 54 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 454
Write 446
Mixed 388
SusWrite 138
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 42.6
144% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback