MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory36.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,106
99% 837 Pts
64-Core 2,116
131% 2,116 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 74.3
63% 76.2 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 58.8
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 767 581 830 766 536 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,953
Write 3,415
Mixed 1,841
SusWrite 727
448% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 73.3
239% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 846
638% 860 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 236%
Great: 472%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
515GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 251 158 159 96 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 468
Write 436
Mixed 380
SusWrite 212
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 45.9
150% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 122%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
2TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 448 447 449 448 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 120
Write 439
Mixed 182
SusWrite 448
68% 297 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 44.6
144% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 199 201 201 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 116
Write 138
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 202
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
120GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 105 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 92
Write 111
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 107
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 KF3200C16D4/16GX CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback