Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 141
56% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 479
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 177F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 44.7
Splatting 40.4
39% 48.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,314
Write 593
Mixed 120
146% 676 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 34.8
125% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 544
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 89.6
120% 232 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
5GB free
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,120
Write 158
Mixed 123
99% 467 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 24.6
95% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 132
136% 229 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Crucial CB8GS2666.C8ET 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 7.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback