Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 17-cb0033ur Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 17-cb0033ur Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8603
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 792
73% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 166
Parallax 156
117% 155 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 132
Splatting 123
117% 146 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 1313 1251 1326 1343 1475 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,191
Write 1,064
Mixed 956
SusWrite 1,341
257% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 59.3
195% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 676
519% 713 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 223%
Great: 333%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
952GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 101 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 55
SusWrite 100
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 76%
HGST HUH 721010ALE604 10TB
8TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 1.1
96% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 60 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 106
Write 110
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 62.5
120% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 53%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 59 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 61.8
118% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 49%
ST6000NM 0024-1HT17Z 6TB
4TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.3 0.2 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 184
Write 168
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 0.2
128% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
165% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 17-cb0033ur Notebook PC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 17-cb0033ur Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback