Intel Burnside

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel Burnside  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160807
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 138
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 293
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
PwrHis(1787 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16.3
10% 15.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/128G 128GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2205XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 175 182 186 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 181
Write 170
Mixed 145
SusWrite 168
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 22.7
77% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 33.4
28% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 82%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
774GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 15.4
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 18.2
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 66%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
213GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 54.4
Write 26.4
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 17.1
36% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
48% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GB
1333, 33 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Burnside Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel Burnside

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback