Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 804
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,045
65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 241
Parallax 295
214% 266 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 228
Splatting 168
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 183%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 435 451 442 386 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 454
Mixed 428
SusWrite 419
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.2
188% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 296
244% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
153GB free
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 55 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 477
Write 407
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 87
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 41.1
120% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 76.2
123% 235 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 91%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
339GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2540 2621 2118 952 955 913 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,791
Write 2,502
Mixed 1,928
SusWrite 1,683
447% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 80.8
283% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,360
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 1184
888% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 315%
Great: 486%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
84GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 85.6
Write 62
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 64.9
86% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 42%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 132 134 133 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 128
Write 90.4
Mixed 102
SusWrite 132
152% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
185GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.9 1 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 92.3
Write 102
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 0.9
91% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 61%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.5 1.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 197
Write 162
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 1.2
132% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 132 134 132 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 102
Write 117
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 132
146% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.7
280% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
379GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 78.5
Write 85.1
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 0.7
78% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 59%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 171
Write 147
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 1.6
122% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 73%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
35GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 163
Write 163
Mixed 123
SusWrite 0.7
142% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback