Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA566II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA566II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 18:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 59.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 263
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 831
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,158
72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 26.7
14% 35.5 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 17.9
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 94 75 67 66 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 858
Write 917
Mixed 773
SusWrite 124
150% 668 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 39.2
129% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 365
314% 450 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 104%
Great: 185%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
460GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 74.3
Write 100
Mixed 67
SusWrite 74.5
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.3% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA566II Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA566II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback