Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B560M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 12:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 823
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1001
62% 1001 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 172
Parallax 195
147% 182 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 152
Splatting 127
124% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 979 986 997 997 998 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,698
SusWrite 1,041
376% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 61
205% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 1,052
787% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 246%
Great: 297%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
383GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 406 411 419 419 419 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GTZR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M Pro4 Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback