Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	16.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	KAZ-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 56 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 37.6 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 129 40% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 437 38% 325 Pts	64-Core 632 39% 632 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 36 21 19 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.8% Very poor	Read 163 Write 42.4 Mixed 97 SusWrite 32.8 18% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.3 10% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 2x16GB 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 26.5 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 231%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350