HP EliteDesk 705 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8463
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-9700 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 87.8
32% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 153
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8463) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 13.6
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.1
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 324 314 316 313 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 874
Write 672
Mixed 661
SusWrite 326
141% 633 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 34.5
115% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 213
165% 229 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 101%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC8T1-BBPS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback