Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 19:51
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$185
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 400
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 9.7
9% 8.13 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 320 323 322 323 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 1,421
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 366
256% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 54.9
187% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 643
DQ Mixed 737
558% 756 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 185%
Great: 284%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
96GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 61 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 35
Write 71.5
Mixed 56
SusWrite 59
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 128 125 116 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 49.8
Write 110
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 123
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
646GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 119 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 104
Write 121
Mixed 100
SusWrite 116
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
454GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 99 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 99.6
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 97.4
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
184GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 92 92 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 95.2
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 89.9
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 KHX2133C14D4/4G 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback