Acer Aspire TC-875

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-875  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-875
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 04:20
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 723
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
PwrHis(1787 2287) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 10
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 34 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 167 166 166 168 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63% Good
Read 151
Write 155
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 153
176% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 63%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 3.5 2.9 1.6 1.4 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 5.1
114% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 64%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 171 169 169 170 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66% Good
Read 164
Write 172
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 157
190% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
124% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 0.1 0.1 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 23.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-875 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-875

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback