Dell Vostro 3300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDell Vostro 3300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 030DMJ
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 09:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron P4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Memory 31.5
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 26
17% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 25.5
8-Core 24.7
3% 25.1 Pts
64-Core 22.3
1% 22.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 043F) 731MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.86 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.17
1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 86.2
Write 84.2
Mixed 78.5
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.32
81% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 246
16% 246 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 3300 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 3300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback