Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 67% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 47.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 266 72% 142 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 379 39% 317 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 36,301 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Acer(1025 152B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.10.1 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Lighting 11 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 25.7 9% 17.4 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 17.3 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IM2P33F8ABR2-256GB 256GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0513A0L Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,457 Write 1,049 Mixed 945 255% 1,150 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 20.8 104% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 54.2 114% 236 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 194%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 444GB free Firmware: 03160102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 317 322 150 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 435 Write 339 Mixed 305 SusWrite 209 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 30.6 104% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 128 103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD4S3200J4G22-BHYD 4JQA-0622AC 8GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 36,301 samples	770x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	201x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GBWDCBench 120%, 3,015 samples	127x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBBench 233%, 2,800 samples	107x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 32%, 6,771 samples	184x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2E1 8GBSamsungBench 68%, 141 samples	77x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples	71x