Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

20 months ago, 4 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 97.8 45% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 229 27% 208 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 14.5 13% 16.3 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 10.3 9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 148 145 146 143 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 201 Write 288 Mixed 220 SusWrite 158 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 28.4 92% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 48.3 DQ Mixed 35.1 28% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 401GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 68 71 72 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 72.7 Write 67.6 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 70.4 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 4x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	3x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	3x

RAM
9905402-174.A00G 9905402-174.A00G 99U5584-009.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 43%, 5 samples	3x
99U5471-004.A01LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 34%, 14 samples	3x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	2x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $448