Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 22:01
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 850
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1024
63% 1024 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 33.2
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 24.8
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 93 124 104 96 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 454
Write 381
Mixed 183
SusWrite 122
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 8.6
63% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 35.6
44% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
XPG GAMMIX S70 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 3.2.F.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2474 2481 2489 2487 2493 2484 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 2,521
Mixed 2,092
SusWrite 2,485
508% 2,237 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 72.5
236% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,104
824% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 348%
Great: 537%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
544GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 39.1
51% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 34.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback