Today's hottest deals

Acer NG-VN7-791G-75WA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NG-VN7-791G-75WA  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer NG-VN7-791G-75WA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 37.3
26% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 65.8
8-Core 92.9
10% 79.4 Pts
64-Core 99.8
6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Acer(1025 091D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 16.9
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.3
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 301 314 315 319 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 355
Write 326
Mixed 301
SusWrite 313
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 14.3
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.5
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 80.4
61% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52%
Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 84 76 81 82 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 70.3
Write 98.5
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 76
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NG-VN7-791G-75WA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NG-VN7-791G-75WA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback