HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 876D
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220718
Uptime16.7 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 110
45% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 265
28% 224 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 876D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 331 308 384 303 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 790
Write 712
Mixed 870
SusWrite 323
151% 674 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 42.8
136% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 322
211% 252 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 104%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT53E1G32D4NQ-046W:E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback