Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81MS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81MS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Memory 17.1
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 50.4
20% 35 Pts
4-Core 53.6
8-Core 31
6% 42.3 Pts
64-Core 27.1
2% 27.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-128GB 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 138 228 242 197 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 263
Write 281
Mixed 258
SusWrite 192
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 15.4
55% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.7
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 106
77% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
385GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 83 102 100 103 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 109
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 93.1
59% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 4.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 343
12% 343 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81MS Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback