HP Desktop 460-p274

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop 460-p274  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 189
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 516
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 87.7
47% 69.1 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 65
Splatting 46.5
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 266 243 139 174 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 424
Write 141
Mixed 363
SusWrite 207
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 35.3
130% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 206
183% 274 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 059B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 22.6
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop 460-p274 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop 460-p274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback