Asus G20BM_A68

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G20BM_A68  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20BM_A68
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 87.1
37% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 82.6
8-Core 109
12% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 37.2
25% 33.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 21.4
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 35 42 71 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 20.4
Write 48.3
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 52
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20BM_A68 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20BM_A68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback