HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory38.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 21:00
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 144
60% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 451
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 21.4
20% 24.8 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 24.3
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1189 1190 1210 1211 1190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,805
Write 1,446
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 1,183
325% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 38
127% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 403
306% 409 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 202%
Great: 410%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
462GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 926 954 926 927 931 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 1,450
Mixed 1,328
SusWrite 952
285% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 48.3
155% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 387
293% 399 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 177%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD M471A4G43MB1-CTD 47GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $258Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback