Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 01:57
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$112
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 907
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil Z3_1TB 1TB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 46 32 68 23 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 446
Write 61.4
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 50.8
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 92.6
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 0.2
15% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 103%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
46GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 111 111 109 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 153
Write 152
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 117
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-22-22 D4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 24.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $835
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback