Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1003w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1003w  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 20:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 94.5
39% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 157
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easys tore 480GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EG43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 69 79 45 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 173
Write 156
Mixed 128
SusWrite 81.1
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 6
23% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 19%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
303GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 69 78 44 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 81
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1003w Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1003w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback