Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Charmander_KL
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 91
2-Core 168
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 188
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1193) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.23 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 287 306 85 145 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 344
Write 276
Mixed 350
SusWrite 188
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 12.7
55% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 31.6
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 86D3 SP016GBSFU240B02 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-51 Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback