Asus PRIME H610M-A D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H610M-A D4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 172
2-Core 296
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 790
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
EVGA(3842 2062) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.6% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 73.1
63% 72.2 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 61.2
62% 78.6 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 1251 325 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 955
Write 1,234
Mixed 1,002
SusWrite 496
208% 922 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 68.6
240% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 797
612% 818 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 180%
Great: 226%
Fanxiang S101 256GB
53GB free
Firmware: U1118A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 20 43 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 406
Write 366
Mixed 286
SusWrite 31
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 0.4
61% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 0.4
14% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 98%
Fanxiang S101 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: HPS2227F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 410 416 424 421 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 430
Write 421
Mixed 329
SusWrite 416
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 11.8
119% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 16.1
71% 156 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H610M-A D4 Builds (Compare 2,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H610M-A D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback