Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	46.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200925
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '22 at 10:53
Run Duration	285 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 800 77% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.47 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 189 Parallax 186 138% 181 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 180 Splatting 124 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB 5,348 User benchmarks, average bench 265% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1479 1594 1620 1694 1775 1769 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 2,147 Write 1,895 Mixed 1,967 SusWrite 1,655 431% 1,916 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 63.1 199% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 484 DQ Mixed 527 394% 526 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 421%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 75GB free Firmware: Z33110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 102 81 98 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 316 Write 136 Mixed 11 SusWrite 106 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 16.2 71% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 34.6 81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 78%
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 25GB free Firmware: FXT03L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 135 137 138 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 426 Write 132 Mixed 172 SusWrite 136 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 20.6 83% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 59.5 56% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 33GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 363 369 370 215 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 361 Write 380 Mixed 264 SusWrite 300 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 30.5 106% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 315 240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 104%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 37GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,312 Write 1,043 Mixed 690 225% 1,015 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 41.8 139% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 558 DQ Write 440 DQ Mixed 497 372% 498 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 102GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 415 393 428 431 429 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 449 Write 388 Mixed 213 SusWrite 419 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 23.4 91% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 126 132% 221 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 99%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB 7,180 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 78GB free Firmware: CC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 129 127 128 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 84.2 Write 129 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 128 67% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT64GX4M2C3200C16 2x31.5GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 22 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 21.7 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	574x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	142x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	122x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	234x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	117x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	58x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	49x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	51x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	45x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $951

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16