MSI MS-16J2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 2QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J2  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 20:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 91
2-Core 161
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 389
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 1138) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 4.2
2% 8.43 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 499 448 413 312 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 445
Write 437
Mixed 408
SusWrite 373
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 23.9
86% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 386
285% 378 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 267%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
807GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 124 128 129 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 119
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J2 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback