Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 128 54% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 428 41% 337 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 38.3 Parallax 36.4 28% 36.3 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 25.7 26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB 11,716 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4152012 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 232 Write 199 Mixed 157 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 25.6 84% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 178 138% 189 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 364GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1803 1058 807 803 806 805 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 2,124 Write 1,872 Mixed 1,678 SusWrite 1,014 375% 1,672 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 54 175% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 500 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 427 309% 405 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 355%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$44 14,978 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 233GB free Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 503 505 514 508 508 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,785 Write 1,801 Mixed 1,473 SusWrite 547 314% 1,402 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 49 160% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 510 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 427 310% 408 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 238%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70CH0- Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1 Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.3% Very good	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 27.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 322 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70CH0- Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1 Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1 32GBSamsungBench 75%, 2 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $245

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16