Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 01:49
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 908
97% 775 Pts
64-Core 1141
71% 1141 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.6% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 59
Parallax 64.5
37% 56.3 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 44
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 85 74 118 101 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 451
Write 52.9
Mixed 129
SusWrite 102
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 34.8
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 60.2
47% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
SSD 256GB 256GB
56GB free
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 81 74 51 72 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 422
Mixed 415
SusWrite 118
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 28.1
136% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 47.6
104% 210 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 166%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
5GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 62.8
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 70.3
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
WD GB External 64GB
44GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
Read 54.7
Write 33.8
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 38.7
52% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 13.9
898% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,142% 15 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 34.8
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 34.6
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback