Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 168
2-Core 325
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,107
107% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,558
96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 85.2
Reflection 131
Parallax 162
69% 126 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 86.5
Splatting 124
105% 130 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 2TB DDR
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAU1RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 2192 2196 2230 2238 2224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,312
Mixed 1,639
SusWrite 2,208
491% 2,188 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 76
254% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 622
545% 816 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 358%
Great: 401%
Colorful SL500 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ZD0R3G5K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 396 395 396 394 393 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 402
Write 370
Mixed 347
SusWrite 393
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 36.2
124% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 186
130% 160 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 90%
PNY CS3040 1TB SSD
160GB free
Firmware: CS304130
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,232
Write 3,121
Mixed 2,286
572% 2,546 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 72.6
230% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 943
708% 947 MB/s
Poor: 212% Great: 513%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
230GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 121 117 119 121 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 100
Write 61
Mixed 74
SusWrite 118
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
65GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 94 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 89.2
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 96.4
50% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
18GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 59 56 52 49 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 105
Write 34
Mixed 49
SusWrite 53.7
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 67%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 116
Mixed 50.3
121% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.9
142% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX KF3600C17D/8GX KF3600C17D/8GX KF3600C17D/8GX 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 38.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback