Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200818
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 23:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 554
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$285
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 123
Parallax 143
113% 135 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.1
91% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata FALCON 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s57
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,802
Write 720
Mixed 497
218% 1,006 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 31.5
118% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 313
235% 309 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 212%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
556GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 27 33 37 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston 9905678-043.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback