HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 218F
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 01:51
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 104
54% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 218F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 2.44
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OACA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 98.9
Mixed 96
73% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8A-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback