Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 43.1 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 25.4 22% 29.5 Pts	4-Core 29.8 8-Core 30.4 4% 30.1 Pts	64-Core 29.7 2% 29.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 792GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 44 36 39 36 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30% Poor	Read 65.6 Write 51 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 38.3 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 109%
Innostor Innostor 16GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 19 16 16 15 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 57.8 Write 13.3 Mixed 12.1 SusWrite 15.8 26% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB 2x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.66% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1 MC Mixed 2.8 6% 2.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 1.4 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	11x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 4,885 samples	10x
F3 DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 38%, 541 samples	8x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $326