Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 158
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 302
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 65.8
55% 68.9 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 58.2
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 142 136 138 143 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 233
Write 186
Mixed 181
SusWrite 142
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 27
87% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 135
103% 136 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
247GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 122 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 124
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 120
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Flash USB Disk 32GB
24GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 22 22 19 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 60.6
Write 15
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 20.7
28% 26 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $870
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback